Empty block elements in Ducktype
Shaun McCance
<shaunm at gnome.org>
Sat Jan 3 00:18:03 EST 2015
- Previous message: Empty block elements in Ducktype
- Sort by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
On Thu, 2015-01-01 at 16:15 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > 6) Decide that lists and tables are special, and that they're the only > things you can keep open with blank lines. They're already special with > rules C, D, and E. I had a go at implementing this. Super-easy, implementation-wise. It does mean that this no longer puts a paragraph in a note: [note] . The Note Title The note body? Nope. But this still does, which I think is more natural anyway: [note] . The Note Title The note body? Yessir. The only thing in my regression tests that failed was this: [terms] [item] [title] Term 3 Definition 3 Would you really write that and expect it to work? I don't know. Maybe you'd write this though, which also fails: [terms] [item] . Term 3 Definition 3 Maybe. The only place I think I really feel like I ought to be able to add copious newlines without indentation is in lists and tables. This parser change is so far feeling very comfortable to me. -- Shaun
- Previous message: Empty block elements in Ducktype
- Sort by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
- More information on mallard-list